Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/8459
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMacLennan, A.en
dc.contributor.authorWilson, D.en
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, A.en
dc.date.issued2002en
dc.identifier.citationPreventive Medicine, 2002; 35(2):166-173en
dc.identifier.issn0091-7435en
dc.identifier.issn1096-0260en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/8459-
dc.description.abstractBackground. The purpose of this study was to measure trends in the prevalence and cost of alternative medicines and alternative practitioner use in an Australian population and to obtain a profile of users and their beliefs. Methods. In 2000, we repeated a 1993 representative population survey of persons ages 15 years or older living in South Australia, which provided 3,027 personal interviews. We assessed the rates of use, types of alternative medicine and therapists, costs, and beliefs of users and nonusers. Comparisons in usage patterns with the 1993 survey were also made. Findings. In 2000, the overall use of at least one nonmedically prescribed alternative medicine (excluding calcium, iron, and prescribed vitamins) was 52.1% (CI +/− 1.8). Users were more likely to be female, be better educated, have a higher income, and be employed. Since 1993, females were using significantly more herbal medicines, ginseng, Chinese medicines, and aromatherapy oils. Many were self-prescribed. Among users, 57.2% (CI +/− 1.2) did not tell their doctor. In 2000, 23.3% of respondents had visited at least one alternative practitioner with increasing use of acupuncturists, reflexologists, aromatherapists, and herbal therapists. Most thought alternative medicines were safe but thought they were, or should be, subject to the same standards as prescribed medicines. Among respondents, 92.9% wished product information to be of standard and content similar to those supplied with pharmaceuticals. Interpretation. Extrapolation of the costs to the Australian population gives an expenditure on alternative therapies in 2000 of $AUD2.3 billion and for the U.S. population an annual expenditure of $US34 billion. In Australia this represents a 120 and 62% increase in the cost of alternative medicines and therapists, respectively, since 1993. In 2000 expenditure on alternative therapies was nearly four times the public contribution to all pharmaceuticals. The public appears to have ambivalent standards for alternative therapies but wishes to be empowered with accurate information to facilitate self-prescription. The public health ramifications of an expanding alternative medicine industry are great.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAlastair H. MacLennan, David H. Wilson, and Anne W. Tayloren
dc.description.urihttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622934/description#descriptionen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherAcademic Press Incen
dc.subjectalternative medicine; alternative therapy; population survey; prevalence; costen
dc.titleThe escalating cost and prevalence of alternative medicineen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0020020918en
dc.identifier.doi10.1006/pmed.2002.1057en
dc.identifier.pubid60072-
pubs.library.collectionObstetrics and Gynaecology publicationsen
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidTaylor, A. [0000-0002-4422-7974]en
Appears in Collections:Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.