Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/84874
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Morauta, J. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 2010; 91(2):208-228 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0279-0750 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1468-0114 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/84874 | - |
dc.description.abstract | A state-based reason for one to intend to perform an action F is a reason for one to intend to F which is not a reason for one to F. Are there any state-based reasons to intend? According to the Explanatory Argument, the answer is no, because state-based reasons do not satisfy a certain explanatory constraint. I argue that whether or not the constraint is correct, the Explanatory Argument is unsound, because state-based reasons do satisfy the constraint. The considerations that undermine the Explanatory Argument also generate a strong, positive case for the existence of state-based reasons to intend. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | James Morauta | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing | - |
dc.rights | © 2010 The Author | - |
dc.source.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2010.01365.x | - |
dc.title | In defence of state-based reasons to intend | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1468-0114.2010.01365.x | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 2 Philosophy publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.