Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/84980
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBroeze, K.-
dc.contributor.authorOpmeer, B.-
dc.contributor.authorvan der Veen, F.-
dc.contributor.authorBossuyt, P.-
dc.contributor.authorBhattacharya, S.-
dc.contributor.authorMol, B.-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationHuman Reproduction Update, 2010; 16(6):561-567-
dc.identifier.issn1355-4786-
dc.identifier.issn1460-2369-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/84980-
dc.description.abstractSystematic reviews and accompanying meta-analyses are the cornerstones of evidence-based medicine. Systematic reviews summarize clinical evidence; meta-analyses provide summary estimates of the treatment effect or the diagnostic test accuracy. Although deemed to provide the highest level of evidence, their clinical value is limited as they can only summarize aggregated data. In these meta-analyses the true variability of the treatment effects cannot be explored to the desired extent, because the meta-analyses cannot distinguish between patients with different clinical profiles. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on individual patient data (IPD), described as the ‘gold standard’ for systematic reviews are a promising approach that might overcome these limitations. IPD meta-analyses allow treatment effects and diagnostic accuracy to be estimated at the level of relevant patient subgroups. This enables researchers to investigate the effectiveness of treatment in patients with different profiles. In this article, we address the opportunities of systematic reviews and meta-analyses using IPD in reproductive medicine. We discuss its potential based on three clinical examples: single versus double embryo transfer in IVF, the diagnosis of tubal pathology and the prognostic value of ovarian reserve tests. We propose to show potential advantages of IPD systematic reviews and meta-analyses in providing stratified clinical evidence, which could improve medical care.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityKimiko A. Broeze, Brent C. Opmeer, Fulco van der Veen, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Siladitya Bhattacharya, and Ben W.J. Mol-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherOxford University Press-
dc.rights© The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved.-
dc.subjectsystematic review; individual patient data meta-analysis; embryo transfer; tubal pathology; ovarian reserve-
dc.titleIndividual patient data meta-analysis: a promising approach for evidence synthesis in reproductive medicine-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/humupd/dmq043-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidMol, B. [0000-0001-8337-550X]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 7
Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.