Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHillis, R.en
dc.contributor.authorHolford, S.en
dc.contributor.authorGreen, P.en
dc.contributor.authorDore, A.en
dc.contributor.authorGatliff, R.en
dc.contributor.authorStoker, M.en
dc.contributor.authorTurner, J.en
dc.contributor.authorUnderhill, J.en
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, G.en
dc.identifier.citationGeophysical Journal International, 2013; 194(2):678-679en
dc.description.abstractWhile Davis et al. provide convincing evidence for dynamic support of modern topography in NW Scotland, we take issue with their claims that the spatial distribution of Cenozoic denudation correlates poorly with the pattern of upper crustal shortening, and that the magnitude of shortening is insufficient to cause the observed denudation. We disagree with Davis et al.'s map of denudation, which forms the basis of their claims, and believe that their conclusions seriously downplay the widely documented contribution of crustal shortening to Cenozoic denudation of many areas of the British Isles.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityRichard R. Hillis, Simon P. Holford, Paul F. Green, Anthony G. Doré, Robert W. Gatliff, Martyn S. Stoker, Jonathan P. Turner, John R. Underhill and Gareth A. Williamsen
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishingen
dc.rights© The Authors 2013en
dc.titleComment on 'Crustal structure of the British Isles and its epeirogenic consequences' by M.W Davis, N.J. White, K.F. Priestley, B.J. Baptie and F.J. Tilmannen
dc.typeJournal articleen
pubs.library.collectionAustralian School of Petroleum publicationsen
dc.identifier.orcidHolford, S. [0000-0002-4524-8822]en
Appears in Collections:Australian School of Petroleum publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.