Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
Full metadata record
|dc.identifier.citation||Work, Employment and Society, 2009; 23(4):693-710||-|
|dc.description.abstract||The article shows that community initiatives take different forms and are the outcome of a broader interplay of factors between workers’ interests, representation, and the strategies of unions and broader coalitions that are mobilized in specific communities. Drawing from three case studies on black and minority ethnic (BME) workers and trade unions in the UK the article looks at how the rhetoric of community unionism has been adopted in an uneven manner by trade unions: the article suggests that: (a) community initiatives are variable, (b) they lack a structure and clear vision, (c) the question of BME engagement is rarely central in many projects, and (d) the ambivalent role of the state is a significant factor in many of these initiatives. This state role is downplayed in much of the literature, thus raising dilemmas in terms of community initiatives.||-|
|dc.description.statementofresponsibility||Miguel Martínez Lucio, Robert Perrett||-|
|dc.rights||Copyright © The Author(s) 2009||-|
|dc.subject||black and minority ethnic||-|
|dc.title||Meanings and dilemmas in community unionism: trade union community initiatives and black and minority ethnic groups in the UK||-|
|Appears in Collections:||Aurora harvest 7|
Australian Institute for Social Research publications
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.