Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/86320
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Penninx, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Herman, M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mol, B. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bongers, M. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2011; 118(6):1287-1292 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0029-7844 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1873-233X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/86320 | - |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of a previous study comparing bipolar radiofrequency endometrial ablation with hydrothermablation for the treatment of menorrhagia at 5-year follow-up. METHOD: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was performed in a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands between March 2005 and August 2007. One-hundred sixty women with menorrhagia were randomly allocated to bipolar ablation or hydrothermablation. The results of follow-up at 12 months were previously reported. At 4–5 years of follow-up, a questionnaire was sent to all the participants to register amenorrhea rates, reinterventions, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: At 5-year follow-up, response rates were 90% and 83% in the bipolar group and hydrotherm group, respectively. Amenorrhea rates were 55.4% and 35.3% in the bipolar group and the hydrotherm group, respectively (relative risk [RR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05–2.3). The number of surgical reinterventions was 11 compared with 23 (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.23–0.80). Overall, more women were satisfied in the bipolar group compared with the hydrotherm group. CONCLUSION: After treatment, bipolar radiofrequency endometrial ablation system is more effective at 5 years than hydrothermablation in the treatment of menorrhagia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Josien P. Penninx, Malou C. Herman, Ben W. Mol, and Marlies Y. Bongers | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins | - |
dc.rights | © 2011 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists | - |
dc.source.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e318236f7ed | - |
dc.subject | Humans | - |
dc.subject | Menorrhagia | - |
dc.subject | Reoperation | - |
dc.subject | Follow-Up Studies | - |
dc.subject | Adult | - |
dc.subject | Middle Aged | - |
dc.subject | Patient Satisfaction | - |
dc.subject | Female | - |
dc.subject | Endometrial Ablation Techniques | - |
dc.title | Five-year follow-up after comparing bipolar endometrial ablation with hydrothermablation for menorrhagia | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318236f7ed | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Mol, B. [0000-0001-8337-550X] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 7 Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.