Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Type: Journal article
Title: The moral intensity of reduced audit quality acts
Author: Coram, P.
Glavovic, A.
Ng, J.
Woodliff, D.R.
Citation: Auditing: a Journal of Practice and Theory, 2008; 27(1):127-149
Publisher: American Accounting Association
Issue Date: 2008
ISSN: 0278-0380
Statement of
Paul Coram, Alma Glavovic, Juliana Ng, and David R. Woodliff
Abstract: Underlying attributes of reduced audit quality (RAQ) acts are investigated in this research paper. Since RAQ acts may result from ethical judgments, we examine whether they could vary because of differences in moral intensity. Moral intensity was proposed by Jones (1991) in a model that looked at the attributes of the moral issue itself. This study examines whether auditors perceive seven different RAQ acts to differ on three components of Jones' model (social consensus, magnitude of consequences, and probability of effect). Little variation was found on the social consensus dimension showing that auditors think the acts equally wrong. However, significant differences in perceptions about the RAQ acts relating to the probability of effect and the magnitude of consequences were found. The results suggest that RAQ acts differ in terms of their moral intensity, and hence auditors' decisions to undertake RAQ behavior may be issue‐contingent. The study provides empirical support for Jones' model by showing, in an audit context, that moral intensity factors vary with the moral issue.
Keywords: reduced audit quality
moral intensity
moral issues
ethical judgments
Rights: Copyright status unknown
DOI: 10.2308/aud.2008.27.1.127
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 2
Business School publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.