Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/87597
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLisy, K.en
dc.contributor.authorWhite, H.en
dc.contributor.authorPearson, A.en
dc.date.issued2014en
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Nursing Practice, 2014; 20(6):701-708en
dc.identifier.issn1322-7114en
dc.identifier.issn1440-172Xen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/87597-
dc.description.abstractChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by a progressive and non-reversible airflow limitation and symptoms of breathlessness, sputum production and cough. COPD is the fourth most common cause of mortality worldwide and represents a significant social and economic burden. As such, effective strategies that might be employed to treat COPD and manage symptoms need to be investigated. This overview aimed to summarize the existing evidence available in the Cochrane Library regarding the use of mechanical interventions used for the treatment and management of COPD. Systematic reviews that included adult participants with diagnosed COPD who received a mechanical intervention were included. Five reviews were included, and due to the heterogeneity of these reviews, direct and indirect comparisons of the effects of the intervention were not possible. Instead, data of the effectiveness of each intervention were extracted and summarized in tables and discussed as a narrative summary. Interventions included non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV), positive airway pressure (PEP) devices and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES). Evidence regarding the effectiveness of NPPV was limited, and available data do not support the use of NPPV for patients with stable COPD. NPPV might, however, be of benefit as a weaning strategy for intubated patients and for patients experiencing respiratory failure; however, more research is required. Although PEP devices are considered as a safe airway clearance technique, data do not reveal a clear clinical benefit to their use. NMES is also regarded as safe for patients with COPD, and might also be beneficial in improving exercise tolerance and improving quality of life for patients with COPD.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityKarolina Lisy, Heath White and Alan Pearsonen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWileyen
dc.rights© 2014 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltden
dc.subjectCOPD; mechanical; overviewen
dc.titleOverview of reviews: mechanical interventions for the treatment and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030013317en
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ijn.12303en
dc.identifier.pubid110135-
pubs.library.collectionTranslational Health Science publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS05en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidLisy, K. [0000-0003-2604-4290]en
Appears in Collections:Translational Health Science publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.