Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
|dc.description.abstract||Evidence for practice has increasingly influenced and contributed to the improvement of health care over the past few decades. While evidence for practice appears to be an integral component to decision making in health care practice, it has historically been dominated by the results of quantitative research. This book reviews the degree to which qualitative research, specifically qualitative systematic review, is valued within the domain of evidence-based practice by examining and exploring contemporary debates on the nature of evidence and the place of qualitative research findings in evidence based health care.||-|
|dc.description.statementofresponsibility||Kylie Porritt, Alan Pearson||-|
|dc.publisher||Lippincott Williams & Wilkins||-|
|dc.rights||Copyright © 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a Wolters Kluwer business.||-|
|dc.title||The historical emergence of qualitative synthesis||-|
|dc.identifier.orcid||Porritt, K. [0000-0002-5975-4179]||-|
|Appears in Collections:||Aurora harvest 7|
Translational Health Science publications
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.