Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||An empirical investigation of scenarios gained and lost in architecture evaluation meetings|
Ali Babar, M.
|Citation:||ESEM'08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, 2008 / pp.348-350|
|Publisher:||Association for Computing Machinery|
|Conference Name:||Second ACM-IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering and measurement (09 Oct 2008 - 10 Oct 2008 : Kaiserslautern, Germany)|
|Dietmar Winkler, Stefan Biffl, Muhammad Ali Babar|
|Abstract:||Studying the effectiveness of scenario development meetings in the software architecture process is important to improve meeting effectiveness. This paper reports initial findings from analyzing the data collected in a controlled experiment aimed at studying the effectiveness of meetings in terms of gained and lost scenarios of individuals, real and nominal (non-communicating) teams. Our findings question the effectiveness of holding meetings since more important scenarios were lost than gained in these meetings. In the study nominal teams performed better than individuals and real teams.|
|Keywords:||Architecture Evaluation; Quality Attributes; Scenarios|
|Rights:||Copyright 2008 ACM|
|Appears in Collections:||Computer Science publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.