Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Material Feminism, Obesity Science and the Limits of Discursive Critique|
|Citation:||Body and Society, 2015; 21(4):48-76|
|Abstract:||This article explores a theoretical legacy that underpins the ways in which many social scientists come to know and understand obesity. In attempting to distance itself from essentialist discourses, it is not surprising that this literature focuses on the discursive construction of fat bodies rather than the materiality or agency of bodily matter. Ironically, in developing arguments that only critique representations of obesity or fat bodies, social science scholars have maintained and reproduced a central dichotomy of Cartesian thinking – that between social construction and biology. In this article I examine the limitations of social constructionist arguments in obesity/critical fat studies and the implications for ignoring materiality. Through bringing together the theoretical insights of material feminism and obesity science’s attention to maternal nutrition and the fetal origins hypothesis, this article moves beyond the current philosophical impasse, and repositions biological and social constructionist approaches to obesity not as mutually exclusive, but as one of constant interplay and connectedness.|
|Keywords:||embodiment; fetal origins hypothesis; material feminism; obesity; obesity science|
|Rights:||© The Author(s) 2014|
|Appears in Collections:||Gender Studies and Social Analysis publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.