Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/90048
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorde Zwart, M.-
dc.contributor.authorHumphreys, S.-
dc.contributor.authorVan Dissel, B.-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationUniversity of New South Wales Law Journal, 2014; 37(2):713-747-
dc.identifier.issn0313-0096-
dc.identifier.issn1839-2881-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/90048-
dc.description.abstractWhether discourse of privacy is sufficient to address new paradigm of information flow and control - confronting a set of practices concerning collection, aggregation, sharing, interrogation and uses of data - scale that crosses private and public boundaries, jurisdictional boundaries - boundaries between reality and simulation.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityMelissa De Zwart, Sal Humphreys and Beatrix Van Dissel-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherLaw School, University of New South Wales-
dc.rightsCopyright of University of New South Wales Law Journal is the property of University of New South Wales Law Journal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.-
dc.source.urihttp://www.unswlawjournal.unsw.edu.au/issue/volume-37-no-2-
dc.titleSurveillance, big data and democracy: lessons for Australia from the US and UK-
dc.typeJournal article-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidde Zwart, M. [0000-0002-9372-1530]-
dc.identifier.orcidHumphreys, S. [0000-0003-3691-8131]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 7
Law publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RA_hdl_90048.pdf
  Restricted Access
Restricted Access2.77 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.