Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTan, N.en
dc.contributor.authorCooksley, C.en
dc.contributor.authorParamasivan, S.en
dc.contributor.authorVreugde, S.en
dc.contributor.authorWormald, P.en
dc.identifier.citationThe Laryngoscope, 2014; 124(2):369-372en
dc.description.abstractObjectives/Hypothesis:Biofilms are associated with clinical relapse following surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis. Encased bacteria are protected from innate immunity and antimicrobial therapy. Surfactants can disperse the biofilm into its planktonic phenotype so that traditional treatments may be effective. The aim of this study was to assess a surfactant for its cytotoxicity profile. Study Design In vitro explant-based cytotoxicity study. Methods:Sinonasal mucosa harvested from patients undergoing sinus surgery was tested using an air-liquid interface explant system. Surfactant at 1×, 2×, and 3× manufacturer's recommended concentrations were compared to control (saline) and Zinc Sulphate (ZnSO4), a known cytotoxic agent. Culture supernatant was analyzed for lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as a marker of cellular toxicity. After 7 days, specimens were imaged using structured histopathology and scanning electron microscopy. Results:Application of surfactant at 1× concentration did not elicit an elevation in LDH, whereas ZnSO4 caused a significant rise 1 day after application. Specimens tested with a 2× and 3× surfactant demonstrated LDH rises 4 days and 2 days after application, respectively. Mucosa tested with the 1× surfactant and control demonstrated intact cellular structures on histopathology and preserved cilial ultrastructure on SEM. In ZnSO4-treated specimens, marked cellular degradation and ciliary denudation occurred. Conclusion:The surfactant does not appear to elicit cellular toxicity using an in vitro explant model at the manufacturer's recommended concentration. At higher concentrations, there may be dose-related toxicity that requires further investigation. In vivo testing is required to prove its efficacy in the treatment of recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis. Level of Evidence: N/Aen
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityNeil C-W Tan, Clare M. Cooksley, Sathish Paramasivan, Sarah Vreugde, Peter-John Wormalden
dc.rights© 2013 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.en
dc.subjectChronic rhinosinusitis; sinus surfactant; cytotoxicity; human sinonasal explants; biofilmen
dc.titleSafety evaluation of a sinus surfactant in an explant-based cytotoxicity assayen
dc.typeJournal articleen
pubs.library.collectionMedicine publicationsen
dc.identifier.orcidVreugde, S. [0000-0003-4719-9785]en
dc.identifier.orcidWormald, P. [0000-0001-7753-7277]en
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.