1. Adelaide Research & Scholarship
  2. Schools and Disciplines
  3. School of Psychology
  4. Psychology publications
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/90858
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBaetu, I.-
dc.contributor.authorBarberia, I.-
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, R.-
dc.contributor.authorBaker, A.-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 2011; 34(4):190-191-
dc.identifier.issn0140-525X-
dc.identifier.issn1469-1825-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/90858-
dc.descriptionCommentary on Jones & Love: Bayesian Fundamentalism or Enlightenment? Published online: 25 August 2011-
dc.description.abstractWe agree with Jones & Love (J&L) that much of Bayesian modeling has taken a fundamentalist approach to cognition; but we do not believe in the potential of Bayesianism to provide insights into psychological processes. We discuss the advantages of associative explanations over Bayesian approaches to causal induction, and argue that Bayesian models have added little to our understanding of human causal reasoning.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityIrina Baetu, Itxaso Barberia, Robin A. Murphy, and A. G. Baker-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)-
dc.rights© Cambridge University Press 2011-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x11000203-
dc.titleMaybe this old dinosaur isn't extinct: what does Bayesian modeling add to associationism?-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0140525X11000203-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidBaetu, I. [0000-0002-5565-7136]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 7
Psychology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.