Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
|dc.identifier.citation||Proceedings, 2014 Australian Earthquake Engineering Society Conference, 2014, pp.1-11||-|
|dc.description.abstract||Nonlinear static (pushover) methods have become increasingly popular in seismic analysis as they allow the explicitly consideration of nonlinear structural behaviour, while retaining the simplicity of the static analysis. Even though significant advances of pushover methods have occurred in recent years, the applicability of such methods for unreinforced masonry buildings with flexible diaphragms has remained relatively unexplored. This paper investigates the accuracies of various pushover methods in predicting the peak seismic response of buildings with flexible diaphragms. The peak displacement demands of simple two-degrees-of-freedom systems, considered to represent the basic characteristics of structures with flexible diaphragms, are estimated using the N2, modal pushover analysis and adaptive capacity spectrum method, and compared against time-history analyses. The results show that pushover methods generally become less reliable when the diaphragm is made flexible. However, the modal pushover analysis appears to be the most promising.||-|
|dc.description.statementofresponsibility||Y. Nakamura, G. Magenes, and M.C. Griffith||-|
|dc.publisher||Australian Earthquake Engineering Society||-|
|dc.subject||Nonlinear static method; pushover analysis; flexible diaphragm||-|
|dc.title||Comparison of pushover methods for simple building systems with flexible diaphragms||-|
|dc.contributor.conference||AEES (21 Nov 2014 - 23 Nov 2014 : Lorne, Victoria)||-|
|dc.identifier.orcid||Griffith, M. [0000-0001-9010-3764]||-|
|Appears in Collections:||Aurora harvest 7|
Civil and Environmental Engineering publications
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.