Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Type: Journal article
Title: Quality of life following repair of large hiatal hernia is improved but not influenced by use of mesh: results from a randomized controlled trial
Author: Koetje, J.
Irvine, T.
Thompson, S.
Devitt, P.
Woods, S.
Aly, A.
Jamieson, G.
Watson, D.
Citation: World Journal of Surgery, 2015; 39(6):1465-1473
Publisher: Springer Verlag
Issue Date: 2015
ISSN: 0364-2313
Statement of
Jan H. Koetje, Tanya Irvine, Sarah K. Thompson, Peter G. Devitt, Simon D. Woods, Ahmad Aly, Glyn G. Jamieson, David I. Watson
Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic surgery is the treatment of choice for repair of large hiatus hernia, but can be followed by recurrence. Repair with prosthetic mesh has been recommended to prevent recurrence, although complications following mesh repair have generated disagreement about whether or not mesh should be used. The early objective and clinical results of a randomized trial of repair with mesh versus sutures have been reported, and revealed few differences. In the current study, we evaluated quality of life outcomes within this trial at follow-up to 2 years. METHODS: In a multicenter prospective double-blind randomized trial three methods for repair of large hiatus hernia were compared: sutures versus repair with absorbable mesh (Surgisis) versus non-absorbable (Timesh). Quality of life assessment using the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire was undertaken at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery. SF-36 outcomes (8 individual scales and 2 composite scales) were determined for each group, and compared between groups, and across different follow-up points. RESULTS: 126 patients were enrolled-43 sutures, 41 absorbable mesh and 42 non-absorbable mesh. 115 (91.3 %) completed a preoperative questionnaire, and 113 (89.7 %) completed the post-operative questionnaire at 3 months, 116 (92.1 %) at 6 months, 114 (90.5 %) at 12 months, and 91 (72.2 %) at 24 months. The SF-36 Physical and Mental Component Scores (PCS and MCS) improved significantly following surgery, and this improvement was sustained across 24 months follow-up (p < 0.001 for PCS and MCS at each follow-up point). There were no significant differences between the groups for the component scores or the eight SF-36 subscale scores at each follow-up time. 29 individuals had a recurrence at 6 months follow-up, of which 9 were symptomatic. The PCS were higher in patients with recurrence versus without (p < 0.01), and in patients with a symptomatic recurrence versus asymptomatic recurrence versus no recurrence (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: SF-36 measured quality of life improved significantly after repair of large hiatal hernia at up to 2 years follow-up, and there were no differences in outcome for the different repair techniques. The use of mesh versus no mesh in repair of large hiatal hernia did not influence quality of life.
Keywords: Humans
Hernia, Hiatal
Postoperative Period
Follow-Up Studies
Prospective Studies
Double-Blind Method
Surgical Mesh
Quality of Life
Surveys and Questionnaires
Rights: © Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-2970-3
Grant ID:
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 7
Surgery publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.