Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Type: Journal article
Title: Treatment patterns among colorectal cancer patients in South Australia: a demonstration of the utility of population-based data linkage
Author: Beckmann, K.
Bennett, A.
Young, G.
Roder, D.
Citation: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2014; 20(4):467-477
Publisher: Wiley
Issue Date: 2014
ISSN: 1356-1294
Statement of
Kerri R. Beckmann, Alice Bennett, Graeme P. Young and David M. Roder
Abstract: RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Population level data on colorectal cancer (CRC) management in Australia are lacking. This study assessed broad level patterns of care and concordance with guidelines for CRC management at the population level using linked administrative data from both the private and public health sectors across South Australia. Disparities in CRC treatment were also explored. METHOD: Linking information from the South Australian Cancer Registry, hospital separations, radiotherapy services and hospital-based cancer registry systems provided data on the socio-demographic, clinical and treatment characteristics for 4641 CRC patients, aged 50-79 years, diagnosed from 2003 to 2008. Factors associated with receiving site/stage-specific treatments (surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy) and overall concordance with treatment guidelines were identified using Poisson regression analysis. RESULTS: About 83% of colon and 56% of rectal cancer patients received recommended treatment. Provision of neo-adjuvant/adjuvant therapies may be less than optimal. Radiotherapy was less likely among older patients (prevalence ratio 0.7, 95% confidence interval 0.5-0.8). Chemotherapy was less likely among older patients (0.7, 0.6-0.8), those with severe or multiple co-morbidities (0.8, 0.7-0.9), and those from rural areas (0.9, 0.8-1.0). Overall discordance with treatment guidelines was more likely among rectal cancer patients (3.0, 2.7-3.3), older patients (1.6, 1.4-1.8), those with multiple co-morbid conditions (1.3, 1.1-1.4), and those living in rural areas (1.2, 1.0-1.3). CONCLUSIONS: Greater emphasis should be given to ensure CRC patients who may benefit from neo-adjuvant/adjuvant therapies have access to these treatments.
Keywords: colorectal neoplasm; disparities; health services research; patterns of care; record linkage
Rights: © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
RMID: 0030024734
DOI: 10.1111/jep.12183
Appears in Collections:Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.