Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/93343
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLen, J.en
dc.contributor.authorBeehan, D.en
dc.contributor.authorLyle, S.en
dc.contributor.authorEilts, B.en
dc.date.issued2013en
dc.identifier.citationTheriogenology, 2013; 80(6):648-653en
dc.identifier.issn0093-691Xen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/93343-
dc.description.abstractAbstract not availableen
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJ.A. Len, D.P. Beehan, S.K. Lyle, B.E. Eiltsen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.rights© 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en
dc.subjectRecovery rate; Plasma membrane; Acrosome; Cushion; Centrifugationen
dc.titleCushioned versus noncushioned centrifugation: sperm recovery rate and integrityen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.06.009en
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
Appears in Collections:Animal and Veterinary Sciences publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.