1. Adelaide Research & Scholarship
  2. Schools and Disciplines
  3. School of Medical Sciences
  4. Medical Sciences publications
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/94461
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorForeman, D.-
dc.contributor.authorPlagakis, S.-
dc.contributor.authorFuller, A.-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationBJU International, 2014; 114(S1):6-8-
dc.identifier.issn1464-4096-
dc.identifier.issn1464-410X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/94461-
dc.description.abstractArguments ‘for’ and ‘against’ ureteric stenting after ureteropyeloscopy are discussed. An individualised approach balancing renal function preservation, irritative lower urinary tract symptoms and emergent return to theatre needs to be adopted while being mindful of healthcare spending.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityDarren Foreman, Sophie Plagakis and Andrew T. Fuller-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.rights© 2014 The Authors BJU International © 2014 BJU International-
dc.subjectStenting; ureteropyeloscopy; routine-
dc.titleShould we routinely stent after ureteropyeloscopy?-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/bju.12708-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 3
Medical Sciences publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.