Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Scenario reliability assessment to support decision makers in situations of severe uncertainty|
|Citation:||2012 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support, CogSIMA 2012, 2012 / pp.30-37|
|Conference Name:||2012 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA) (06 Mar 2012 - 08 Mar 2012 : New Orleans, Louisiana)|
|Tina Comes, Niek Wijngaards, John Maule, David Allen, Frank Schultmann|
|Abstract:||Decision making under uncertainty is fraught with pitfalls for human thinking: biases prevail. The combination of a scenario-based approach with multi-criteria decision analysis assists in making value judgements, trade-offs and uncertainties explicit. Scenarios, which are constructed in a distributed manner involving multiple experts from different domains, assist in overcoming e.g. the prominence effect and confirmation bias. Furthermore, support is provided to handle the uncertainty associated with each scenario without imposing unjustified assumptions on each piece of information. We develop a relative reliability concept, which differs from standard probability assessments as it is sensitive to the context, such as the decision problem at hand, the decision makers' requirements and the available information. This approach maintains the flexibility of the distributed system by allowing the experts to adapt the information they provide and the likelihood assessments thereof to the situation. Our approach is illustrated by an emergency management example.|
|Rights:||© 2012 IEEE|
|Appears in Collections:||Entrepreneurship, Commercialisation, and Innovation Centre publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.