Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Disappointment aversion premium principle|
|Citation:||Astin Bulletin: The Journal of the ASTIN and AFIR Sections of the International Actuarial Association, 2015; 45(3):679-702|
|Publisher:||Cambridge University Press|
|Ka Chun Cheun, Wing Fung Chong, Robert Elliott, and Sheung Chi Phillip Yam|
|Abstract:||In recent years, the determination of premium principle under various non-expected utility frameworks has become popular, such as the pioneer works by Tsanakas and Desli (2003) and Kaluszka and Krzeszowiec (2012). We here revisit the problem under another prevalent behavioral economic theory, namely the Disappointment Aversion (DA) Theory proposed by Gul (1991). In this article, we define and study the properties of the DA premium principle, which builds on the equivalent utility premium principle. We derive various properties of this premium principle, such as non-negative and no unjustified risk loading, translation invariance, monotonicity, convexity, positive (non-)homogeneity, independent (non-)additivity, comonotonic (non-)additivity and monotonicity with respect to the extent of disappointment. A generalized Arrow–Pratt approximation is also established. Explicit representations of the premium principle are obtained for linear and exponential utilities, and they reveal that the premium principle proposed echoes the capital reserve regulatory requirement in practice.|
|Keywords:||Disappointment aversion theory; equivalent utility premium principle; general- ized Arrow–Pratt approximation; explicit representations; capital reserve regu- latory requirement|
|Rights:||© by Astin Bulletin 2015|
|Appears in Collections:||Aurora harvest 3|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.