Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorStott, Philip Georgeen
dc.contributor.advisorWebb, Graham C.en
dc.contributor.authorPerryman, Aryn Whiteen
dc.description.abstractMarsupial species provide an important research tool in attempts to unravel the complicated mechanisms of mammalian reproduction. Comparisons between metatherian and eutherian reproductive life history patterns used to achieve the same outcomes, illuminates processes that have been difficult to investigate in eutherian species alone. Adaptive sex allocation is one such area that has provided equivocal data that is much scrutinized and debated amongst scientists. The theory that has provided the most disparity in the literature, and lead to the most debate, is the Trivers-Willard Model (TWM) (Trivers & Willard, 1973). The TWM proposes that, in polygynous mammalian species where the male has increased variability in reproductive returns, mothers in ‘good condition’ should bias their offspring towards sons, to maximise their fitness. There are three main assumptions associated with the theory: 1) that sons will benefit more than daughters from increased maternal resource allocation, 2) that juvenile condition predicts adult condition and 3) that maternal quality is a predictor of offspring quality. Much of the previous support for the TWM has been based on research in eutherian species (e.g. ungulate species), which usually tests only one assumption at a time by a posteriori application of the theory to observed data. Macropod species fill similar niches to ungulate species in other ecosystems and provide easy access to pouch young at a very early stage of development, which facilitates the investigation of all the TWM assumptions on a single population. The assumptions were tested by 1) field collections on wild populations of Kangaroo Island Macropus eugenii, to see if the pattern occurred, 2) controlled experimental breeding, to find the true adaptive nature of any bias and to see if the effect could be produced by manipulation, 3) feeding experiments, to see if compensatory growth occurred, 4) further testing on females and males to assess the presence and timing of control mechanisms. The overall sex ratio of the sampled wild population was 1:1, but larger, older females showed a 74% chance of having daughters as opposed to sons, while smaller, younger mothers showed a 60% chance of having sons. The pattern was not repeated in the breeding experiments, as females showed an 81% chance of producing a son regardless of maternal condition. Juvenile females produced an overcompensation response to reduced resource availability, while males showed partial compensation, recovering body weight but not condition. There was no evidence of a post-conception maternally-controlled mechanism, as there was no discrepancy between genetic sex and phenotypic sex. However, adult males did show a reduced %Y sperm count, averaging 44-45% Y sperm, significantly lower than the expected 50%. Therefore, although some of the results showed confirmation of the TWM, when analysed separately, there was little support for the individual assumptions and it is more likely that there is a more complicated, stress induced, adaptive sex ratio process in this species, controlled by either (or both) sex prior to or at conception, which is influenced by external stimuli other than resource allocation or in conjunction with it.en
dc.subjectmacropod reproduction; sex ratio theory; Trivers - Willard hypothesis; marsupial sex ratio theory; Macropus eugeniien
dc.titleSex ratio theory applied to a macropod marsupial : Is reproduction by the Tammar Wallaby (Macropus eugenii) consistent with sex ratio theory?en
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciencesen
dc.provenanceThis electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at:
dc.description.dissertationThesis (Ph.D.) -- University of Adelaide, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2012en
Appears in Collections:Research Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01front.pdf532.69 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
02whole.pdf3.62 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
  Restricted Access
Library staff access only290.03 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
  Restricted Access
Library staff access only3.78 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.