Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/96282
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFeather, N.en
dc.contributor.authorMcKee, I.en
dc.date.issued2012en
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 2012; 42(10):2479-2504en
dc.identifier.issn0021-9029en
dc.identifier.issn1559-1816en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/96282-
dc.description.abstractThis study related hostile and benevolent attitudes toward women (HS and BS) as measured by the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI) to 10 value types from the Schwartz Value Survey, right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), and social dominance orientation (SDO). Students (N = 170) from an Australian university completed the scales. The results showed gender differences in the importance of power values, HS, BS, RWA, SDO, and in some of the correlations. HS and BS were positively correlated with power and security values, and negatively correlated with universalism and benevolence values after controlling for gender. RWA and SDO were related to distinct value patterns with some overlap, and they partially mediated relations between value importance and HS and BS.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityNorman T. Feather and Ian R. McKeeen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWileyen
dc.rights© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en
dc.titleValues, right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and ambivalent attitudes toward womenen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030023986en
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00950.xen
dc.identifier.pubid155727-
pubs.library.collectionPsychology publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS02en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
Appears in Collections:Psychology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.