Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Type: Journal article
Title: Piloting an online incident reporting system in Australasian emergency medicine
Author: Schultz, T.
Crock, C.
Hansen, K.
Deakin, A.
Gosbell, A.
Citation: EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia, 2014; 26(5):461-467
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Issue Date: 2014
ISSN: 1742-6731
Statement of
Timothy J Schultz, Carmel Crock, Kim Hansen, Anita Deakin and Andrew Gosbell
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Medical-specific incident reporting systems are critical to understanding error in healthcare but underreporting by doctors reduces their value. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a pilot study of the implementation of an online ED-specific incident reporting system in Australasian hospitals and evaluated its use. METHODS: The reporting system was based on the literature and input of experts. Thirty-one hospital EDs were approached to pilot the Emergency Medicine Events Register (EMER). The pilot evaluated: website usage and analytics, reporting behaviours and rates, the quality of information collected in EMER. Semi-structured interviews of three site champions responsible for implementing EMER were conducted. RESULTS: Seventeen EDs expressed interest; however, due to delays and other barriers reporting only occurred at three sites. Over 354 days, the website received 362 unique visitors and 77 incidents. The median time to report was 4.6 min. The reporting rate was 0.07 reports per doctor month, suggesting a reporting rate of 0.08% of ED presentations. Data quality, as measured by the number of completed non-mandatory fields and ability to classify incidents, was very high. The interviews identified enablers (the EMER system, site champions) and barriers (chiefly the context of EM) to EMER uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Collecting patient safety information by frontline doctors is essential to actively engage the profession in patent safety. Although the EMER system allowed easy online reporting of high quality incident data by doctors, site recruitment and system uptake proved difficult. System use by ED doctors requires dedicated and conscious effort from the profession.
Keywords: adverse event; emergency medicine; incident reporting; near misses; safety learning system
Rights: © 2014 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine and Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine
RMID: 0030014521
DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.12271
Appears in Collections:Nursing publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.