Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/96863
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | The first shared online curriculum resources for veterinary undergraduate learning and teaching in animal welfare and ethics in Australia and New Zealand |
Author: | Johnson, J. Collins, T. Degeling, C. Fawcett, A. Fisher, A. Freire, R. Hazel, S. Hood, J. Lloyd, J. Phillips, C. Stafford, K. Tzioumis, V. McGreevy, P. |
Citation: | Animals, 2015; 5(2):395-406 |
Publisher: | MDPI |
Issue Date: | 2015 |
ISSN: | 2076-2615 2076-2615 |
Statement of Responsibility: | Jane Johnson, Teresa Collins, Christopher Degeling, Anne Fawcett, Andrew D. Fisher, Rafael Freire, Susan J. Hazel, Jennifer Hood, Janice Lloyd, Clive J. C. Phillips, Kevin Stafford, Vicky Tzioumis and Paul D. McGreevy |
Abstract: | The need for undergraduate teaching of Animal Welfare and Ethics (AWE) in Australian and New Zealand veterinary courses reflects increasing community concerns and expectations about AWE; global pressures regarding food security and sustainability; the demands of veterinary accreditation; and fears that, unless students encounter AWE as part of their formal education, as veterinarians they will be relatively unaware of the discipline of animal welfare science. To address this need we are developing online resources to ensure Australian and New Zealand veterinary graduates have the knowledge, and the research, communication and critical reasoning skills, to fulfill the AWE role demanded of them by contemporary society. To prioritize development of these resources we assembled leaders in the field of AWE education from the eight veterinary schools in Australia and New Zealand and used modified deliberative polling. This paper describes the role of the poll in developing the first shared online curriculum resource for veterinary undergraduate learning and teaching in AWE in Australia and New Zealand. The learning and teaching strategies that ranked highest in the exercise were: scenario-based learning; a quality of animal life assessment tool; the so-called 'Human Continuum' discussion platform; and a negotiated curriculum. |
Keywords: | animal ethics; animal welfare; online curriculum resources; learning and teaching; scenarios; quality of life assessment |
Description: | Published: 29 May 2015 |
Rights: | © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
DOI: | 10.3390/ani5020362 |
Appears in Collections: | Animal and Veterinary Sciences publications Aurora harvest 3 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
hdl_96863.pdf | Published version | 162.51 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.