Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRead, J.en
dc.contributor.authorBengsen, A.en
dc.contributor.authorMeek, P.en
dc.contributor.authorMoseby, K.en
dc.identifier.citationWildlife Research, 2015; 42(1):1-12en
dc.descriptionPublished: 22 May 2015en
dc.description.abstractContext: Automatically activated cameras (camera traps) and automated poison-delivery devices are increasingly being used to monitor and manage predators such as felids and canids. Maximising visitation rates to sentry positions enhances the efficacy of feral-predator management, especially for feral cats, which are typically less attracted to food-based lures than canids. Aims: The influence of camera-trap placement and lures were investigated to determine optimal monitoring and control strategies for feral cats and other predators in two regions of semi-arid South Australia. Methods: We compared autumn and winter capture rates, activity patterns and behaviours of cats, foxes and dingoes at different landscape elements and with different lures in three independent 6 km × 3 km grids of 18 camera-trap sites. Key results: Neither visual, olfactory or audio lures increased recorded visitation rates by any predators, although an audio and a scent-based lure both elicited behavioural responses in predators. Cameras set on roads yielded an eight times greater capture rate for dingoes than did off-road cameras. Roads and resource points also yielded highest captures of cats and foxes. All predators were less nocturnal in winter than in autumn and fox detections at the Immarna site peaked in months when dingo and cat activity were lowest. Conclusions: Monitoring and management programs for cats and other predators in arid Australia should focus on roads and resource points where predator activity is highest. Olfactory and auditory lures can elicit behavioural responses that render cats more susceptible to passive monitoring and control techniques. Dingo activity appeared to be inversely related to fox but not cat activity during our monitoring period. Implications: Optimised management of feral cats in the Australian arid zone would benefit from site- and season-specific lure trials.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJ. L. Read, A. J. Bengsen, P. D. Meek and K. E. Mosebyen
dc.publisherCSIRO Publishingen
dc.rightsJournal compilation © CSIRO 2015en
dc.subjectauditory; camera traps; Canis lupus dingo; Felis catus; grooming traps; olfactory; Vulpes vulpesen
dc.titleHow to snap your cat: optimum lures and their placement for attracting mammalian predators in arid Australiaen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.orcidRead, J. [0000-0003-0605-5259]en
dc.identifier.orcidMoseby, K. [0000-0003-0691-1625]en
Appears in Collections:Earth and Environmental Sciences publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.