Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Piracy and universal jurisdiction|
|Citation:||Macquarie Law Journal, 2013; 12:131-154|
|Abstract:||This article will examine the history of piracy jure gentium and the law as it currently stands, showing that piracy does not lie within the realm of universal jurisdiction or international criminal law. The history component will separate the rhetoric of ‘pirates’ and ‘piracy’ from the legal definition, a practice that is often lacking in considerations of piracy jure gentium. The examination of the current law will explore the codification of piracy in UNCLOS, particularly the articulation of jurisdiction in Article 105 as it compares to the universal jurisdiction afforded other jus cogens crimes. From this it will be clear that piracy is not a crime of universal jurisdiction based on the heinousness of the crime, as is the case with international crimes, but rather a crime of concurrent municipal jurisdiction based on the stateless nature of the crime.|
|Keywords:||Piracy; Universal Jurisdiction; Transnational Crime; International Law; International Criminal Law; Legal History; Concurrent Municipal Jurisdiction|
|Rights:||Copyright status unknown|
|Appears in Collections:||Law publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.