Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2440/98057
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcCallum, S.en
dc.contributor.authorMikocka-Walus, A.en
dc.contributor.authorTurnbull, D.en
dc.contributor.authorAndrews, J.en
dc.date.issued2015en
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Dual Diagnosis, 2015; 11(3-4):217-232en
dc.identifier.issn1550-4263en
dc.identifier.issn1550-4271en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/98057-
dc.description.abstractObjective: The goal of this work is to review the current literature on continuity of care in the treatment of people with dual diagnosis. In particular, this review set out to clarify how continuity of care has been defined, applied, and assessed in treatment and to enhance its application in both research and clinical practice. Methods: To identify articles for review, the term “continuity” and combinations of “substance” and “treatment” were searched in electronic databases. The search was restricted to quantitative articles published in English after 1980. Papers were required to discuss “continuity” in treatment samples that included a proportion of patients with a dual diagnosis. Results: A total of 18 non-randomized studies met the inclusion criteria. Analysis revealed six core types of continuity in this treatment context: continuity of relationship with provider(s), continuity across services, continuity through transfer, continuity as regularity and intensity of care, continuity as responsive to changing patient need, and successful linkage of the patient. Patient age, ethnicity, medical status, living status, and the type of mental health and/or substance use disorder influenced the continuity of care experienced in treatment. Some evidence suggested that achieving continuity of care was associated with positive patient and treatment-related outcomes. Conclusions: This review summarizes how continuity of care has been understood, applied, and assessed in the literature to date. Findings provide a platform for future researchers and service providers to implement and evaluate continuity of care in a consistent manner and to determine its significance in the treatment of people with a dual diagnosis.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityStacey McCallum, Antonina Mikocka-Walus, Deborah Turnbull, and Jane M. Andrewsen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen
dc.rightsCopyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLCen
dc.subjectDual diagnosis; comorbidity; continuity of care’ literature reviewen
dc.titleContinuity of care in dual diagnosis treatment: definitions, applications, and implicationsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.identifier.rmid0030037239en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15504263.2015.1104930en
dc.identifier.pubid216652-
pubs.library.collectionMedicine publicationsen
pubs.library.teamDS14en
pubs.verification-statusVerifieden
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
dc.identifier.orcidMikocka-Walus, A. [0000-0003-4864-3956]en
dc.identifier.orcidTurnbull, D. [0000-0002-7116-7073]en
dc.identifier.orcidAndrews, J. [0000-0001-7960-2650]en
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.