Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
Full metadata record
|dc.identifier.citation||International Journal of Modelling and Simulation, 2012; 32(2):95-103||en|
|dc.description.abstract||In this paper, design structure matrix (DSM) methods are presented to manage design iteration or rework which is inherent in the design process. Three DSM methods: path searching, powers of the adjacency matrix, and reachability matrix methods are discussed. Their advantages and disadvantages with respect to the project scope are summarized. As a case study, DSM methods are implemented to reduce the design iteration or rework in a complex engineering project. The main advantage of the DSM methods over traditional project management tools such as CPM or Gantt chart is in compactness and ability to present an organized and efficient mapping among tasks that is clear and easy to read regardless of size.||en|
|dc.publisher||Taylor & Francis||en|
|dc.rights||Copyright status unknown||en|
|dc.subject||Design process; design structure matrix; partitioning; project management; scheduling||en|
|dc.title||Analysis of design structure matrix methods in design process improvement||en|
|pubs.library.collection||Entrepreneurship, Commercialisation, and Innovation Centre publications||en|
|dc.identifier.orcid||Gunawan, I. [0000-0001-7357-509X]||en|
|Appears in Collections:||Entrepreneurship, Commercialisation, and Innovation Centre publications|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.