Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAnkeny, R.-
dc.contributor.authorBray, H.-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 2016; 9(1):166-191-
dc.description.abstractWomen are typically seen as gatekeepers in the acceptance of genetically modified (GM) foods because they perform the majority of food related activities in the home. At the same time, it has been reported that they are more opposed to GM foods than men are. We conducted a qualitative study to explore women’s attitudes to and values associated with GM foods and situated those attitudes and values in the context of everyday food choices. In this paper, we illustrate that attitudes toward GM foods, ethical food choices, and risk arise from the complex and simultaneous interactions of women’s activities as professionals, carers, and the providers of “good food.”-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityRachel A. Ankeny, Heather J. Bray-
dc.publisherUniversity of Toronto Press-
dc.rightsCopyright © 2016 The International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics-
dc.subjectGenetically modified food; Australian women; ethical consumption; everyday ethics-
dc.title"If we’re happy to eat it, why wouldn't we be happy to feed it to our children?": Articulating the complexities underlying women's ethical views on genetically modified food-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.orcidAnkeny, R. [0000-0002-1547-6031]-
dc.identifier.orcidBray, H. [0000-0002-9435-8876]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 3
History publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.