Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/99799
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Collaborative care for comorbid depression and coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Author: Tully, P.
Baumeister, H.
Citation: BMJ Open, 2015; 5(12):e009128-1-e009128-11
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
Issue Date: 2015
ISSN: 2044-6055
2044-6055
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Phillip J Tully, Harald Baumeister
Abstract: To systematically review the efficacy of collaborative care (CC) for depression in adults with coronary heart disease (CHD) and depression.Systematic review and meta-analysis.Electronic databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL) were searched until April 2014.Population, depression comorbid with CHD; intervention, randomised controlled trial (RCT) of CC; comparison, either usual care, wait-list control group or no further treatment; and outcome, (primary) major adverse cardiac events (MACE), (secondary) standardised measure of depression, anxiety, quality of life (QOL) and cost-effectiveness.RevMan V.5.3 was used to synthesise the data as risk ratios (RRs), ORs and standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% CIs in random effect models.Six RCTs met the inclusion criteria and comprised 655 participants randomised to CC and 629 participants randomised to the control group (total 1284). Collaborative depression care led to a significant reduction in MACE in the short term (three trials, RR 0.54; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.95, p=0.03) that was not sustained in the longer term. Small reductions in depressive symptoms were evident in the short term (6 trials, pooled SMD -0.31; 95% CI -0.43 to -0.19, p<0.00001) and depression remission was more likely to be achieved with CC (5 trials, OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.28 to 2.44, p=0.0005). Likewise, a significant effect was observed for anxiety symptoms (SMD -0.36) and mental QOL (SMD 0.24). The timing of the intervention was a source of between-group heterogeneity for depression symptoms (between groups p=0.04, I(2)=76.5%).Collaborative depression care did not lead to a sustained reduction in the primary MACE end point. Small effects were observed for depression, depression remission, anxiety and mental QOL.PROSPERO CRD42014013653.
Keywords: Mental health
Rights: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009128
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1053578
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 7
Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_99799.pdfPublished Version1.43 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.