Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Scopus||Web of Science®||Altmetric|
|Title:||Systematic assessment of clinical practice guidelines for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease|
|Citation:||Respiratory Medicine, 2003; 97(1):37-45|
|Publisher:||W B Saunders Co Ltd|
|B. J. Smith, K. Hender, P. Frith, A. J. Crockett, F. Cheok and S. Spedding|
|Abstract:||OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the quality of the development of guidelines for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODOLOGY: MEDLINE and Excerpta Medica search for published guidelines, followed by independent evaluation by two reviewers, according to previously reported guideline development quality criteria, on a three-point scale. RESULTS: Five national COPD guidelines and two international COPD guidelines were retrieved. Reviewers demonstrated good inter-observer agreement in assessing the 10 combined guideline development criteria for the seven guidelines [κ=0.66]. Guidelines were only partly multi-disciplinary, with little or no consumer input, were up to 48 pages in length, and often lacked practical summaries or management flow charts which could have facilitated retrieval of key management recommendations. Almost all the papers were based upon a consensus approach, rather than evidence based, and methods of resolution of differences of opinion were not stated. Patient outcomes, ethical and medico-legal implications were not addressed and six of the guidelines were sponsored directly or indirectly by a single drug company. Conclusions: In spite of COPD guidelines being reported by major national bodies for over a decade now, most fail to meet important criteria for high-quality guideline development, and evaluation of clinical impact remains undetermined.|
pulmonary disease (specialty)/standards
|Description:||Copyright © 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.|
|Appears in Collections:||Aurora harvest|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.