Carnivore resource subsidies to support predator reintroductions and mitigate threats to reintroduced prey
Date
2025
Authors
Stepkovitch, B.
Tuft, K.
Manders, N.
Moseby, K.E.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Journal of Wildlife Management, 2025; 89(5):e70028-1-e70028-21
Statement of Responsibility
Ben Stepkovitch, Katherine Tuft, Nathan Manders, Katherine E. Moseby
Conference Name
Abstract
The potential risk to threatened prey species is a real or perceived barrier to reintroducing carnivores to fenced or island conservation reserves. Supplementary feeding of reintroduced carnivores is a tool that may increase translocation success and ease predation pressure on prey populations at critical times. In 2020–2022, we monitored the activity of native prey, and the activity and diet of a reintroduced predator, the western quoll (Dasyurus geoffroii), around carcass feeding stations in an Australian fenced reserve. We compared camera detections of predators and prey at sites where carcass presence was manipulated (carcasses added, removed, or absent) over a period of 21 months. Quoll activity and detections increased around feeding stations when carcasses were added, while activity of small rodents and bilbies were reduced. Bandicoot detections at sites with carcasses were also reduced but only at sites where supplementary carcasses had been provisioned for >2 years. There were significant (rodents) and non‐significant (bilbies, bandicoots) trends for less prey remains in scats collected close to feeding stations, suggesting prey behavioral avoidance rather than elevated hunting at feeding sites. In comparison, reptiles, also a quoll prey item, were higher in scats near feeding stations, suggesting reptile attraction to feeding stations where they are preyed on by quolls. Our results, combined with previously demonstrated reductions in mammalian prey abundance at a reserve‐wide scale, suggest that carcass subsidies do not elevate hunting at local scales but could sustain or increase predator density at broad scales. Until further work is conducted, we advocate for only intermittent use of feeding stations during the immediate post‐release period to help anchor and acclimatize predators to the release site, and during times of resource scarcity such as drought.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
© 2025 The Author(s). The Journal of Wildlife Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Wildlife Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.