Perceived acceptability of wearable devices for the treatment of mental health problems
Files
(Accepted version)
Date
2020
Authors
Hunkin, H.
King, D.L.
Zajac, I.T.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2020; 76(6):987-1003
Statement of Responsibility
Hugh Hunkin, Daniel L. King, Ian T. Zajac
Conference Name
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the potential acceptability of wearable devices (e.g., smart headbands, wristbands, and watches) aimed at treating mental health disorders, relative to conventional approaches. METHODS: A questionnaire assessed perceptions of wearable and nonwearable treatments, along with demographic and psychological information. Respondents (N = 427) were adults from a community sample (Mage = 44.6, SDage = 15.3) which included current (30.2%) and former (53.9%) mental health help-seekers. RESULTS: Perceived effectiveness of wearables was a strong predictor of interest in using them as adjuncts to talk therapies, or as an alternative to self-help options (e.g., smartphone applications). Devices were more appealing to those with negative evaluations of psychological therapy and less experience in help-seeking. CONCLUSIONS: Interest in using wearable devices was strong, particularly when devices were seen as effective. Clients with negative attitudes to conventional therapies may be more responsive to using wearable devices as a less directive treatment approach.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.