Legal pluralism and the rule of law in Timor Leste
Files
(Published version)
Date
2006
Authors
Grenfell, L.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Leiden Journal of International Law, 2006; 19(2):305-337
Statement of Responsibility
Laura Grenfell
Conference Name
Abstract
Many transitional countries face the problem of establishing the rule of law in a weak justice sector where a gulf separates local legal norms from national, constitutional norms that are drawn largely from the international sphere.As a case study of East Timor this article challenges simplistic positivist notions about the normative hierarchy of laws within a constitutionally bounded polity. It argues that in transitional countries such as East Timor legal pluralism is important but must be properly tuned to serve the rule of law. Legal pluralism poses certain dangers when it operateswithout any of the checks or balances that ensure accountability and the promotion of constitutional values such as equality. The rule of law is not served by an informal system where there are no formal avenues of appeal and thus minimal accountability and transparency. Amore promising version of legal pluralism that comports with the rule of law is one that empowers the state to monitor local decisions to ensure that they observe the norms set out in East Timor’s Constitution.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
© Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law