Evaluation of Glyoxal fixation for immunohistochemistry of the retina.
Files
(Published version)
Date
2025
Authors
Chidlow, G.
Wood, J.P.M.
Chan, W.O.
Casson, R.J.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Scientific Reports, 2025; 15(1):21274-1-21274-17
Statement of Responsibility
Glyn Chidlow, John P.M. Wood, Weng Onn Chan, Robert J. Casson
Conference Name
Abstract
Immunohistochemistry has become an essential tool in retinal research. Formaldehyde is the gold standard fixative, but the development of an improved fixative is of keen interest. Herein, we performed a comprehensive evaluation of the compatibility of glyoxal fixation with retinal immunohistochemistry, using wholemounts, cryosections and paraffin-embedded eyes. Immunohistochemistry was performed in normal rat eyes, and, to facilitate localisation of stressresponse proteins, eyes subjected to laser-induced retinal injury or injected with the endotoxin lipopolysaccharide. Regarding wholemounts, glyoxal fixation produced retinas that were too fragile to be consistently dissected as pristine wholemounts. In terms of antigenicity, we observed no consistent improvement when glyoxal fixation was used. Some antibodies produced higher signal intensities, but a greater number displayed weaker signal-to-background patterns of labelling compared to formaldehyde fixation. For cryosections and paraffin sections, we likewise found no compelling evidence that immunohistochemical signals were intensified when formaldehyde was replaced by glyoxal. For the 50 antibodies tested, formaldehyde typically produced signal-to-background immunolabelling that was equivalent or superior to glyoxal. In conclusion, the results of this study do not support the use of glyoxal fixation for immunohistochemistry of the rat retina, but with the caveat that improved formulations and protocols may address the limitations exposed herein.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
© The Author(s) 2025. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.