Antenatal Point-of-Care Ultrasound Training and Accreditation: a Cross-Sectional Survey of Australian Rural Clinicians
Date
2025
Authors
Bidner, A.
Bezak, E.
Parange, N.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Australian Journal of Rural Health, 2025; 33(6, article no. e70111):1-12
Statement of Responsibility
Conference Name
Abstract
Objective: To explore the perceptions of rural Australian clinicians towards antenatal point-of-care ultrasound (APoCUS) training and accreditation, investigating barriers and enablers to continuing professional development (CPD).
Methods: A prospective cross-sectional online survey of rural Australian clinicians (doctors, nurses, midwives) was undertaken in 2023, using non-probability sampling with self-selection/voluntary response. The survey targeted rural clinicians caring for pregnant patients. Thematic and descriptive analyses were performed with response frequencies grouped by role, work sector, APoCUS use and previous training experience. Fisher's exact test was used for association.
Results: Fifty-seven responses were analysed (41 midwives/nurses, 16 physicians/doctors). Two-thirds were performing APoCUS, half reported formal or on-the-job training, and none were accredited. Midwives/nurses had a poorer understanding of their scope of practice (eligibility to learn/perform APoCUS) and accreditation requirements. Interest in accreditation was high, particularly for the midwife/nurse cohort. The perceived benefits of accreditation surrounded improved patient care and services, scanning capability and professional satisfaction. The main barriers to pursuing accreditation were supervision for scanning and assessments, cost, time commitment and workforce shortages. Half of the respondents had access to employer-provided CPD funds, and most reported having to self-fund to meet professional registration requirements.
Conclusion: Australian rural clinicians are driven to upskill and provide high-quality care to patients but face significant barriers to CPD and attaining accreditation, evidenced by low accreditation rates. Future efforts should focus on simplifying accreditation processes, improving access to qualified supervisors/mentors and raising awareness of training and accreditation opportunities while providing support and incentives for rural clinicians to facilitate access.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
Copyright 2025 National Rural Health Alliance