Graphic design research: a cause for the concerned
Files
(Published version)
Date
2018
Authors
Harland, R.G.
Corazzo, J.
Gwilt, I.
Honnor, A.
Rigley, S.
Editors
Storni, C.
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Conference paper
Citation
Proceedings of DRS 2018: Catalyst, 2018 / Storni, C. (ed./s), pp.2811-2821
Statement of Responsibility
Conference Name
DRS Design Research Society 2018 (25 Jun 2018 - 28 Jun 2018 : University of Limerick, Ireland)
Abstract
There is an immediate need to clarify and develop the role of graphic design research for the theoretical underpinning of graphic design education. A report that accompanied the 2014 UK Research Excellence Framework (REF2014) described ‘the intellectual and theoretical underpinning of graphic and communication design’ as "generically weak’. We report on progress about a project designed to identify and map graphic design outputs from REF2014, involving both a data analysis of the ‘Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory’ submissions, and focus group research with graphic design academics designed to elicit feedback on the emergent themes being addressed by the data analysis exercise as well as broader concerns. The aim has been to identify the nature of graphic design outputs submitted to the REF audit. In this paper, we provide a response to this state of affairs from a community of graphic design educators concerned about the perception of research in the discipline.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
Copyright 2018 Design Research Society. This is an Open Access Paper. It is published by Design Research Society under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)