Variability, negative evidence, and the acquisition of verb argument constructions
Files
(Accepted version)
Date
2010
Authors
Perfors, A.
Tenenbaum, J.
Wonnacott, E.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Journal of Child Language, 2010; 37(3 Sp Iss):607-642
Statement of Responsibility
Amy Perfors, Joshua B. Tenenbaum and Elizabeth Wonnacott
Conference Name
Abstract
We present a hierarchical Bayesian framework for modeling the acquisition of verb argument constructions. It embodies a domain-general approach to learning higher-level knowledge in the form of inductive constraints (or overhypotheses), and has been used to explain other aspects of language development such as the shape bias in learning object names. Here, we demonstrate that the same model captures several phenomena in the acquisition of verb constructions. Our model, like adults in a series of artificial language learning experiments, makes inferences about the distributional statistics of verbs on several levels of abstraction simultaneously. It also produces the qualitative learning patterns displayed by children over the time course of acquisition. These results suggest that the patterns of generalization observed in both children and adults could emerge from basic assumptions about the nature of learning. They also provide an example of a broad class of computational approaches that can resolve Baker's Paradox.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010