Health effects of children's summer holiday programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Files

s12966-024-01658-8.pdf (2.1 MB)
  (Published version)

Date

2024

Authors

Eglitis, E.
Singh, B.
Olds, T.
Virgara, R.
Machell, A.
Richardson, M.
Brannelly, K.
Grant, A.
Gray, J.
Wilkinson, T.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2024; 21(1):1-19

Statement of Responsibility

Conference Name

Abstract

Background: Unfavourable changes occur in children’s health behaviours and outcomes during the summe rholidays. This systematic review aimed to determine the effectiveness of summer holiday programs in mitigating these changes. Methods: Six databases (MEDLINE, JBI, Psych INFO, Embase, ERIC and Scopus) were systematically searched for experimental controlled studies that investigated programs of at least 5 days’ duration conducted exclusively during the summer holiday period on school-aged children (5–18 years). Primary outcomes were moderate-vigorous physical activity and energy intake. Secondary outcomes were sedentary behavior, diet quality, adiposity, and cardiorespiratory fitness. Risk of Bias was assessed using the PEDro tool. Effect sizes were calculated using random effects meta-analysis with narrative synthesis of effects by student or program characteristics. Results: Ten studies (two randomised controlled trials, and eight non-randomised controlled trials) involving 1,446participants were included. Summer programs had a significant moderate effect on reducing sedentary behaviour(g= -0.59, 95%CI= -1.16, -0.03) and significant small effects on improving moderate-to-vigorous physical activity(g=0.35, 95%CI=0.02, 0.67) and adiposity (g= -0.25, 95% CI = -0.39, -0.10). No significant change was detected for cardiorespiratory fitness (g=0.43, 95%CI= -0.32, 1.17), energy intake (g= -0.06, 95% CI -2.33, 2.22), or diet quality(g=0.20, 95%CI= -0.43, 0.83). Summer program effectiveness did not appear to differ by child sociodemographic or program characteristics. Concerns regarding bias and high heterogeneity impacted results. Conclusions: Summer programs show potential in promoting healthier movement behaviours in children and supporting healthy body weight during the summer months. Although evidence from the included studies has limitations, these programs produced small to moderate effect sizes and present promising health intervention opportunities for children. Future research with more rigorous study designs and comprehensive reporting is needed to confirm these findings and better understand the impact of summer programs on children’s health. Prospero registration: CRD42023409795.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Data source: electronic supplementary material, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-024-01658-8

Access Status

Rights

Copyright 2024 The Authors. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) Access Condition Notes: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

License

Grant ID

Call number

Persistent link to this record