Geochronological and geochemical insights into episyenite metasomatic overprint in the Proterozoic Suomenniemi rapakivi granite complex (Finland)

Date

2025

Authors

Abersteiner, A.
Rämö, O.T.
Kontonikas-Charos, A.
Kharkongor, M.
Karampelas, N.
Gilbert, S.E.
Wade, B.
Ambroziak-Murzyn, K.
Lloyd, J.C.
Beier, C.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

Lithos, 2025; 516-517:108269-1-108269-18

Statement of Responsibility

Adam Abersteiner, O. Tapani Rämö, Alkis Kontonikas-Charos, Melissa Kharkongor, Nikolaos Karampelas, Sarah E. Gilbert, Ben Wade, Karolina Ambroziak-Murzyn, Jarred C. Lloyd, Christoph Beier, Stijn Glorie

Conference Name

Abstract

Rapakivi granites from the late Paleoproterozoic Suomenniemi Complex (south-eastern Finland) experienced pervasive localised metasomatism via interaction of high-temperature, oxidising peralkaline fluids and granite along dyke-like zones, resulting in the formation of episyenite bodies. To constrain the timing and conditions of episyenite formation, we combine in-situ Usingle bondPb zircon, Usingle bondPb and Lusingle bondHf apatite, and Usingle bondPb titanite geochronology with petrography and mineral chemistry from four episyenite bodies. Zircon yields Usingle bondPb ages coeval with crystallisation of the ca. 1644 Ma granite, preserving the igneous protolith age, whereas Usingle bondPb ages from hydrothermally modified zircon (1635.1 ± 2.7 Ma; 1627.8 ± 6.3 Ma) and apatite (1611.6 ± 9.5 Ma; 1630 ± 19 Ma), along with hydrothermal titanite (1603 ± 43 Ma; 1623 ± 30 Ma) record younger ages, reflecting variable degrees of disturbance of the Usingle bondPb system and indicating that episyenite formation post-dated granite emplacement. Apatite Lusingle bondHf ages (1648 ± 30 Ma; 1643 ± 41 Ma) and some titanite Usingle bondPb ages (1646 ± 12 Ma; 1642 ± 62 Ma) overlap with the host granite but their large uncertainties preclude confident attribution to either magmatic crystallisation or subsequent metasomatism. Collectively, these data indicate that episyenitisation postdated granite emplacement and was likely driven by regional thermal perturbations linked to the emplacement of the ∼1630 Ma Wiborg Batholith. Petrographic and mineral chemistry analyses of zircon, apatite, and titanite indicate that hydrothermal alteration of the protolith was highly variable, both between episyenite bodies and even over small metre-scale intervals within individual bodies. This is evident in zircon, where different areas of high intensity hydrothermal alteration under high temperature and oxidising conditions resulted dissolution and reprecipitation of zircon. Apatite in the host granite was likely recrystallised during episyenitisation, as evidenced by textural modification and younger Usingle bondPb ages. Titanite is an accessory mineral found exclusively within the episyenite bodies and is absent in the surrounding granite protolith. It commonly occurs as inclusions in mafic mineral aggregates or as rims around Fesingle bondTi oxides (magnetite, ilmenite), suggesting a hydrothermal origin associated with episyenitisation and crystallisation under oxidising conditions. Variations in the major (Al, Fe, Ti, F) and trace element (light REE, Nb) chemistry of titanite and Zr-in-titanite thermometry (660–875 °C) further indicate differences in hydrothermal fluid composition and temperatures during titanite formation across different episyenite bodies. These findings, along with the overlapping ages of hydrothermal titanite and the host protolith, suggest that the episyenites in the Suomenniemi Complex formed by fluid-rock interaction, either shortly after consolidation of the main granite sequence of the complex and/or during subsequent regional rapakivi granite magmatism. Thus, resolving the timing of episyenite formation is crucial for understanding fluid-assisted alteration of granitic systems, identifying potential fluid sources, and assessing their geochemical evolution and metallogenic potential.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Access Status

Rights

© 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

License

Call number

Persistent link to this record