Barriers to the 4-h rule: what causes delays for gynaecology patients in the emergency department?
Date
2013
Authors
Pakmehr, S.
Petersen, R.
Quinlivan, J.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2013; 53(1):46-50
Statement of Responsibility
Sahar Pakmehr, Rodney W. Petersen and Julie A. Quinlivan
Conference Name
Abstract
<h4>Objectives</h4>To explore factors that led to noncompliance with the 4-h rule for gynaecology patients in a general emergency department.<h4>Methods</h4>A cross-sectional cohort study was performed at a general emergency department. The files of all female patients aged from birth to 100 years presenting from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2010 were screened. Those patient's files where a coded gynaecological diagnosis was made were reviewed. A time flow analysis was then undertaken of 580 consecutive files to evaluate barriers to admission or discharge of patients within the 4-h period. A further 300 files were audited to determine whether suboptimal management by emergency department staff contributed towards delays.<h4>Results</h4>There were 134 438 presentations to the emergency department, of which 2968 were gynaecology presentations (2.2%). The overall compliance with the 4-h rule was 66%. Patients with acute triage status, who were pregnant or who were eventually admitted, were more likely to be managed in compliance with the 4-h rule. The main barriers to compliance were incomplete examinations by emergency department staff; waiting for ultrasound examinations and blood test results; delays waiting for specialty review; and delays caused by initial review by surgical teams.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Specific barriers to compliance with the 4-h rule can be identified in gynaecology patients. Strategies specific to overcome these barriers can be developed to improve compliance.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
© 2012 The Authors