Selective comminution for upgrading nickel and cobalt in nickel laterite ores

Date

2025

Authors

Acquah, G.
Abaka-Wood, G.B.
Addai-Mensah, J.
Asamoah, R.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

Minerals Engineering, 2025; 233(109667)

Statement of Responsibility

Conference Name

Abstract

This study evaluates batch wet grinding of sized limonitic nickel laterite in a laboratory stirred mill to determine optimal conditions for nickel and cobalt upgrading. The effects of sodium hexametaphosphate (SHMP) dispersant, grinding time, and feed size fractions were investigated. The optimal grinding time for nickel upgrade was 0.1 min for −1180 + 600, −600 + 300, and −300 + 150 µm fractions using 5 % SHMP. The best results were observed in the −1180 + 600 and −600 + 300 underscreen fractions, where nickel grades increased from 0.89 % and 0.87 % to 1.18 % and 1.06 %, with enrichment ratios of 1.3 and 1.2 and recoveries of 72 % and 73 %, respectively. In contrast, cobalt was predominantly enriched in the overscreen fractions alongside Mn and Si, regardless of processing conditions. Compositing underscreen fractions resulted in a total nickel grade of 1.05 % with an enrichment ratio of 1.4, while cobalt was enriched 1.5 times in the combined overscreen with a grade of 0.25 %. Grinding an unsized feed led to only marginal Ni grade increases, emphasizing the importance of feed sizing before grinding. Implications for downstream processing were assessed, proposing two extraction strategies: (1) HPAL processing for the −150 µm fraction, with combined underscreen and overscreen materials allocated to tank leaching and heap leaching/RIMM, respectively; or (2) combining underscreen material with the −150 µm fraction (∼92 % of the total ore) for HPAL processing, while overscreen treatment route remains unchanged. Both strategies optimize resource utilization, improve process efficiency, and enhance metal recovery without material loss.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Access Status

Rights

Copyright 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

License

Call number

Persistent link to this record