A point mutation in IAA34 confers resistance to the auxin herbicide 2,4-D in Sisymbrium orientale
Date
2025
Authors
Qi, Y.
Krishnan, M.
Tucker, M.
Preston, C.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Pest Management Science, 2025; 81(7):3523-3531
Statement of Responsibility
Yuanlin Qi, Mahima Krishnan, Matthew Tucker, and Christopher Preston
Conference Name
DOI
Abstract
Background: Sisymbrium orientale has evolved resistance to 2,4-D in Australia due to a 27 bp deletion in SoIAA2. However, one population of Sisymbrium orientale resistant to 2,4-D (R1) did not contain the SoIAA2Δ27, suggesting another 2,4-D resistance mechanism was present in this population. Here, we reported a novel target-site resistance mechanism of 2,4-D in the R1 population. Results: R1 is resistant to 2,4-D, 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA), and fluroxypyr with increased tolerance to dicamba, triclopyr and picloram. The 2,4-D resistance level for R1 is lower than resistant populations containing a 27 bp deletion in IAA2. 2,4-D resistance in R1 was due to a single dominant gene. Pretreatment of R1 with the P450 inhibitor malathion did not reduce resistance to 2,4-D. We identified a point mutation, Leu 175 Pro, in SoIAA34 in R1, but not in three susceptible (S) populations. This mutation was present (either homozygous or heterozygous) in all 2,4-D resistant plants in a segregating F2 population generated from a cross between S and R1 plants. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing SoIAA34-R had significantly greater root length and dry mass than the wild-type (WT) or transgenic Arabidopsis plants carrying SoIAA34-S under 2,4-D treatment. Conclusion: We confirmed resistance to 2,4-D in the R1 population was controlled by a single dominant locus. Further, we verified that the Leu 175 Pro mutation in SoIAA34 is responsible for the 2,4-D resistance in R1.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
© 2025 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.