Levelling-up summer: using summer holiday programs to support child health and wellbeing - a Delphi study
Date
2025
Authors
Eglitis, E.
Olds, T.
Virgara, R.
Machell, A.
Richardson, M.
Brannelly, K.
Maher, C.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
BMC Public Health, 2025; 25(1, article no. 3782):1-14
Statement of Responsibility
Conference Name
Abstract
BackgroundChildren's health behaviours tend to worsen during the summer holidays, with declines in physical activity, diet, sleep, and mental wellbeing. Structured summer holiday programs may help counter these trends, while also supporting families and reducing inequalities. The purpose of this study was to establish the interest, perceived importance, and key preferences for structured summer programming in Australia and explore potential delivery models with an emphasis on sustainability, scalability and supporting families living on low incomes.MethodsA three-round Delphi study was conducted between November 2024 and April 2025. The Delphi panel consisted of stakeholders from government, extended care, research, education and parenting backgrounds. Round 1 explored perceived importance, barriers, and facilitators; Round 2 examined program features, and delivery and funding models; and Round 3 focused on priorities to improve access for families living on low incomes. Consensus was set a priori at 80%.ResultsSixty stakeholders agreed to participate, with an average response rate of 65%. There was consensus that summer programming is important for children's physical and mental health, and social skills. Program cost, access (availability, transport) and awareness were identified as key barriers to participation. Participants agreed that programs should run for the entire working day and offer accessible, inclusive, enrichment-focused activities. For families on low incomes, providing meals and snacks was viewed as essential. A daily family contribution of $1-$10 was considered acceptable to encourage attendance and perceived value.There was no single preferred delivery model, stakeholders emphasised the need for flexible, locally adapted approaches that build on existing community infrastructure and partnerships. Top barriers to national scale-up included lack of sustainable government funding, high operational costs, and workforce shortages. The most popular angles for advocacy were supporting children's socio-emotional and mental wellbeing, and positive ways to spend time.ResultsSixty stakeholders agreed to participate, with an average response rate of 65%. There was consensus that summer programming is important for children's physical and mental health, and social skills. Program cost, access (availability, transport) and awareness were identified as key barriers to participation. Participants agreed that programs should run for the entire working day and offer accessible, inclusive, enrichment-focused activities. For families on low incomes, providing meals and snacks was viewed as essential. A daily family contribution of $1-$10 was considered acceptable to encourage attendance and perceived value.There was no single preferred delivery model, stakeholders emphasised the need for flexible, locally adapted approaches that build on existing community infrastructure and partnerships. Top barriers to national scale-up included lack of sustainable government funding, high operational costs, and workforce shortages. The most popular angles for advocacy were supporting children's socio-emotional and mental wellbeing, and positive ways to spend time.ConclusionThere is clear stakeholder support for expanding structured summer holiday programming in Australia, particularly to benefit children from disadvantaged backgrounds. Programs have the potential to promote health, wellbeing, and equity, but realising this will require government investment, local partnerships, and delivery models that reflect community needs. These findings may inform similar efforts in other countries where summer programs are not equitably available.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
Copyright 2025 The Author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use,sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) andthe source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)