Reliability and validity of self-reported sitting and breaks from sitting in the workplace

Date

2018

Authors

Sudholz, B.
Ridgers, N.D.
Mussap, A.
Bennie, J.
Timperio, A.
Salmon, J.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2018; 21(7):697-701

Statement of Responsibility

Conference Name

Abstract

Objectives: Prolonged sitting is a health risk factor which is ubiquitous to the workplace, and breaking up prolonged sitting is widely recommended. This study evaluated the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of a self-report measure of duration of sitting and breaks from sitting in the workplace.Design: Cross-sectional study.Methods: Fifty-nine workers who reported spending most of their work time sitting wore an activPAL inclinometer and the ActiGraph accelerometer for eight consecutive days, and completed single-item measures of duration of sitting (min/work hour) and breaks from sitting (frequency/per work hour), twice, seven days apart.Results: Participants reported sitting at work for a median of 420 min/day (lnterquartile Range = 360-450 min/day) and taking one break (Interquartile Range = 1.0-2.0) from sitting per work hour. For reported duration of workplace sitting, test-retest reliability was adequate (Intra-Class Correlations = 0.78, 95% Confidence Intervals [CI] = 0.65, 0.86), and concurrent validity fair against the activPAL (Spearman's Rho = 0.24, CI-1.0,0.47) and the ActiGraph (Rho = 0.39, CI=0.15, 0.68). For reported breaks from sitting (frequency/per work hour), test-retest reliability was adequate (Intra-Class Correlations = 0.65, CI = 0.48, 0.78) and concurrent validity fair against the activPAL (Spearman's Rho = 0.39, CI = 0.25, 0.74) and the ActiGraph (Spearman's Rho = 0.30, CI = 0.15, 0.69). Self-reported duration of sitting was biased toward over-reporting compared to the activPAL (median = 45.4 min) and under-reporting compared to the ActiGraph (median = 21.7 min).Conclusions: This study found adequate reliability and fair validity for self-reported duration of sitting (min/work day) and breaks from sitting (frequency/per work hour). Further validity research is needed using the inclinometer. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Sports Medicine Australia.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Link to a related website: https://unpaywall.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.030, Open Access via Unpaywall

Access Status

Rights

Copyright 2018 Elsevier

License

Grant ID

Call number

Persistent link to this record