Effective refractive error coverage in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of updated estimates from population-based surveys in 76 countries modelling the path towards the 2030 global target

Files

hdl_147124.pdf (2.46 MB)
  (Published version)

Date

2025

Authors

Bourne, R.R.A.
Cicinelli, M.V.
Selby, D.A.
Sedighi, T.
Tapply, I.H.
McCormick, I.
Jonas, J.B.
Abdianwall, M.H.
Bikbov, M.M.
Braithwaite, T.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

The Lancet Global Health, 2025; 13(8):e1396-e1405

Statement of Responsibility

Conference Name

Abstract

Background: In 2024, WHO included effective refractive error coverage (eREC) into the results framework of the 14th General Programme of Work, which sets a road map for global health and guides WHO’s work between 2025 and 2028. eREC is a measure of both the availability and quality of refractive correction in a population. This study aimed to model global and regional estimates of eREC as of 2023 and evaluate progress towards the WHO global target of a 40 percentage-point absolute increase in eREC by 2030. Methods: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, the Vision Loss Expert Group analysed data from 237 populationbased eye surveys conducted in 76 countries since 2000, comprising 815 273 participants, to calculate eREC (met need / met need + undermet need + unmet need]) and the relative quality gap between eREC and REC ([REC – eREC] / REC × 100, where REC = [met + undermet need] / [met need + undermet need + unmet need]). An expert elicitation process was used to choose covariates for a Bayesian logistic regression model used to estimate eREC by country–age–sex grouping among adults aged 50 years and older. Country–age–sex group estimates were aggregated to provide estimates according to Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) super-regions. Findings: Global eREC was estimated to be 65·8% (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 64·7–66·8) in 2023, 6 percentage points higher than in 2010 (eREC 59·8% [59·4–60·2]). There were marked differences in eREC between GBD superregions in 2023, ranging from 84·0% (95% UI 83·0–85·0) in high-income countries to 28·3% (26·4–30·4) in sub- Saharan Africa. In all super-regions, eREC was lower in females than males, and decreased with increasing age among adults aged ≥50 years. Since 2000, the relative increase in eREC was 60·2% in sub-Saharan Africa, 45·7% in North Africa and the Middle East, 41·5% in southeast Asia, east Asia and Oceania, 40·3% in south Asia, 16·2% in Latin America and the Caribbean, 8·3% in central Europe, eastern Europe and central Asia, and 6·8% in the highincome super-region. The relative quality gap ranged from 2·9% to 78·3% across studies, with larger gaps characteristically in regions of lower eREC. Globally, the percentage of those with a refractive need that was undermet reduced between 2000 and 2023, from 10·0% (95% UI 9·5–10·5) to 5·3% (5·1–5·5). Interpretation: The current trajectory of improvement in eREC and the relative quality gap are insufficient to meet the 2030 target. Global efforts to equitably increase spectacle coverage, such as the WHO SPECS 2030 initiative, and to address equity failings associated with geography, age, and sex, are crucial to accelerating progress towards the 2030 targets. No region is close to achieving universal coverage.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Access Status

Rights

© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.

License

Grant ID

Call number

Persistent link to this record