Sea Ice Floe Segmentation in Close-Range Optical Imagery Using Active Contour and Foundation Models

Files

hdl_149880.pdf (24.64 MB)
  (Published version)

Date

2026

Authors

Passerotti, G.
Alberello, A.
Vichi, M.
Bennetts, L.G.
Bailey, J.
Toffoli, A.

Editors

Advisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type:

Journal article

Citation

Earth and Space Science, 2026; 13(2):e2025EA004453-1-e2025EA004453-30

Statement of Responsibility

Giulio Passerotti, Alberto Alberello, Marcello Vichi, Luke G. Bennetts, James Bailey, and Alessandro Toffoli

Conference Name

Abstract

The size of sea ice floes in the marginal ice zone (MIZ) is a key factor influencing ice coverage, albedo, wave propagation, and ocean–atmosphere energy exchanges. Floe size can be observed by processing visual-range imagery from ships, aircraft, or satellites. However, autonomously capturing floe boundaries remains challenging, particularly due to sea ice heterogeneity, which impairs boundary definition and reduces image clarity. This study evaluates the accuracy of sea ice floe segmentation using the gradient vector flow (GVF) active contour method, the deep learning-based Segment Anything Model (SAM), and a hybrid approach combining GVF and SAM. Methods are evaluated on a representative subset of a large data set of close-range, high-resolution imagery collected from cameras aboard an icebreaker during an Antarctic winter expedition. Spanning a wide range of ice conditions and image clarity in the MIZ, the subset provides a rigorous segmentation test bed. Performance is assessed in terms of floe detection accuracy, size distribution, and ice concentration, with results compared against a manually segmented benchmark. Results indicate SAM, in prompt-driven mode, offers the best balance between accuracy and computational efficiency. Its strong performance in estimating sea ice concentration and detecting floes, while maintaining close agreement with benchmark floe size distributions, makes it suitable for real-time applications and scalable analyses of large imagery data sets. Compared with SAM, the combined SAM-GVF method provides more accurate floe boundary delineation, although at much higher computational cost, and is therefore better suited for analyses requiring precise floe shapes.

School/Discipline

Dissertation Note

Provenance

Description

Access Status

Rights

© 2026. The Author(s). This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

License

Call number

Persistent link to this record