Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results
| dc.contributor.author | Yu, C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gao, X. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Deng, D. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yip, K. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Smales, R. | |
| dc.date.issued | 2004 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective: To compare the survival of glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations placed in a dental clinic setting using both the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach with hand instruments, and conventional cavity preparation with rotary instruments. Method and Materials: Two encapsulated high-strength conventional GICs (Fuji IX GP, Ketac-Molar Aplicap) were placed in 82 Class I and 53 Class II preparations and one encapsulated non-gamma 2 amalgam alloy (GK-amalgam) was placed in 32 Class I preparations, in the primary molars of 60 Chinese children with a mean age of 7.40 ± 1.24 (SD) years. Thus, 9 treatment groups were formed. Results: After two years, there were no significant survival differences found among 7 of the 9 treatment groups (p = 0.99). However, two groups comprising Fuji IX GP and Ketac-Molar Aplicap placed in Class II cavities prepared using the ART approach showed significantly lower restoration survivals (p < 0.001). Only 3 of the 72 initially sealed fissures adjacent to the restorations appeared to retain any GIC material. Conclusions: In a clinic setting, both the ART hand instrument and conventional rotary instrument methods were equally suitable for high Class I restoration survival, but not for Class II restoration survival where the conventional cavity preparation method was preferable. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | International Dental Journal, 2004; 54(1):42-46 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2004.tb00251.x | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0020-6539 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/3945 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | F D I World Dental Press Ltd | |
| dc.rights | © 2004 FDI/World Dental Press | |
| dc.source.uri | https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595x.2004.tb00251.x | |
| dc.subject | Atraumatic restorative treatment | |
| dc.subject | glass ionomer cement | |
| dc.subject | primary teeth | |
| dc.title | Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results | |
| dc.type | Journal article | |
| pubs.publication-status | Published |