Public judgement on sentencing: final results from the Tasmanian jury sentencing study
Date
2011
Authors
Warner, K.
Davis, J.
Walter, M.
Bradfield, R.
Vermey, R.
Editors
Advisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type:
Journal article
Citation
Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 2011; (407):1-6
Statement of Responsibility
Conference Name
Abstract
Public opinion surveys conducted worldwide over the last four decades have consistently found that between 70 and 80 percent of respondents believe that sentences are too lenient (Gelb 2006). Responding to research suggesting that judges are out of touch withpublic opinion, Chief Justice Gleeson of the High Court of Australia suggested that, instead of surveying uninformed members of the public, it might be more useful if jurors-as more informed representatives of the public-were asked about the sentences in the particular cases they have deliberated on (Gleeson 2005). The Tasmanian Jury Sentencing Study,which surveyed 698 jurors from 138 trials between September 2007 and October 2009, was inspired by this suggestion.
School/Discipline
Dissertation Note
Provenance
Description
Access Status
Rights
Copyright 2011 Australian Institute of Criminology